As the document alleged to have been forged was not produced in the court the provisions on S.195(1)(b)(ii). Supreme Court of India Sushil Kumar And Ors vs State Of Haryana … Continue reading When original not produced before Court S.195(1)(b)(ii) not attracted.
QUESTION : Cinematograph Act 1952 Section 5A-Whether the issuance of the certificate issued by the specialised Board of Film Censors bars the criminal Court’s jurisdiction to try for offences under … Continue reading Supreme Court on obscenity (Raj Kapoor v. State) Justice Krishna Iyer.
A Remarkable judgment outlining the law of obscenity as it stands in India, in a nutshell, while holding Bandit Queen to have been rightly passed by the Censors, held it … Continue reading Supreme Court on obscenity (Bandit Queen Judgment)
Though overruled by SC in a later decision in 1999 – this decision is highly public oriented – wherein the ministers, rightly, were held to be repositories of public trust, … Continue reading Arbitrary Allotment of Petrol Pumps …SC
Comment : The Court held that to bring a case under section 300 IPC Part 3 – the prosecution need not prove that the accused knew the injury to be sufficient … Continue reading Virsa Singh v. State of Punjab – SC on Murder S.300 IPC