Misuse of 498a – False 498A Legal Terrorism says Supreme Court in Sushil Kumar

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Civil appeal No. 4399 of 2005 (Arising out of SLP (C) no. 17656 of 2004 Decided On: 19.07.2005 Appellants: Sushil Kumar SharmaVs.Respondent: Union of India (UOI) … Continue reading Misuse of 498a – False 498A Legal Terrorism says Supreme Court in Sushil Kumar

Contract–Money deposited as earnest money–Breach committed by buyer-Right of seller to forfeit-Principles. Contract Act (9 of 1872), ss. 64 and 74-Scope of.

Supreme Court of India Shree Hanuman Cotton Mills & Ors vs Tata Air-Craft Ltd on 28 October, 1969 Equivalent citations: 1970 AIR 1986, 1970 SCR (3) 127 Bench: Vaidyialingam, C.A. … Continue reading Contract–Money deposited as earnest money–Breach committed by buyer-Right of seller to forfeit-Principles. Contract Act (9 of 1872), ss. 64 and 74-Scope of.

Is criminal judgment binding on a civil case ?

Comment : We, therefore, are of the opinion that the judgment in a criminal case was not relevant in evidence for the purpose of proving a person’s civil liability and the … Continue reading Is criminal judgment binding on a civil case ?