Skip to content

Demystifying Indian Law & Legal System

About the blog
Write in
Home/Columns

Search for:

Twitter
Instagram

Twitter
Instagram

Search for:

Twitter
Instagram

Tag: Infar (India) Ltd. vs Madan Mohan Ghosh And Ors. on 15 May

By Bharat Chugh Posted on April 4, 2012

Supreme Court on obscenity (Raj Kapoor v. State) Justice Krishna Iyer.

QUESTION : Cinematograph Act 1952 Section 5A-Whether the issuance of the certificate issued by the specialised Board of Film Censors bars the criminal Court’s jurisdiction to try for offences under … Continue reading Supreme Court on obscenity (Raj Kapoor v. State) Justice Krishna Iyer.

Categories: UncategorizedTags: 1860, 1952, 1983, 1997, 2000, 2001, 2007, 2010, abuse of process, article 19, article 19(1)(a), Article 19(1)(a) in The Constitution Of India 1949, article 19(2), Article 19(2) in The Constitution Of India 1949, article 32, bandit queen case, Bibhut Bhusan Jena vs Union Of India And Others on 15 September, censorship, cinematograph act, code of criminal procedure 1973, criminal procedure code 1973, cruelty, dacoity, fundamental rights, gang rape, incest, Infar (India) Ltd. vs Madan Mohan Ghosh And Ors. on 15 May, inherent power of high court, intercourse, interlocutory orders, K. Rama Brahmam vs Central Board Of Film ... on 16 September, kidnapping, krishna iyer, letters patent, letters patent appeal, madhu limaye, Nav Chandra Jha vs The Presiding Officer And Anr. on 1 February, obscene, obscenity, obscenity judgment, phoolan devi, public order, public policy, ragging, rape, section 292, Section 292 in The Indian Penal Code, Section 397 in The Indian Penal Code, section 482, Section 482 in The Indian Penal Code, Section 5B in The Cinematograph Act, secularism, sex, Smt. Periyakkal & Others vs Smt. Dakshyani on 2 March, social justice, The Cinematograph Act, The Indian Penal Code, The Management vs The Presiding Officer on 20 January

By Bharat Chugh Posted on April 4, 2012

Supreme Court on obscenity (Bandit Queen Judgment)

A Remarkable judgment outlining the law of obscenity as it stands in India, in a nutshell, while holding Bandit Queen to have been rightly passed by the Censors, held it … Continue reading Supreme Court on obscenity (Bandit Queen Judgment)

Categories: UncategorizedTags: 1952, 1983, 1997, 2000, 2001, 2007, 2010, article 19, article 19(1)(a), Article 19(1)(a) in The Constitution Of India 1949, article 19(2), Article 19(2) in The Constitution Of India 1949, article 32, bandit queen case, Bibhut Bhusan Jena vs Union Of India And Others on 15 September, cinematograph act, cruelty, dacoity, fundamental rights, gang rape, incest, Infar (India) Ltd. vs Madan Mohan Ghosh And Ors. on 15 May, intercourse, K. Rama Brahmam vs Central Board Of Film ... on 16 September, kidnapping, krishna iyer, letters patent, letters patent appeal, Nav Chandra Jha vs The Presiding Officer And Anr. on 1 February, obscenity, phoolan devi, ragging, rape, Section 5B in The Cinematograph Act, sex, Smt. Periyakkal & Others vs Smt. Dakshyani on 2 March, The Cinematograph Act, The Management vs The Presiding Officer on 20 January

Search

Search for:

Top Posts & Pages

Phone-tapping and Recording of a Phone conversation: Is it legal and admissible?
Tips for Judicial Service examination preparation; A Guest Post by Mr. Pratik Sagar (Civil Judge, 30th Batch, Bihar)
Law 101 : A Ready Reckoner on the Law of Bail
Issues relating to Multiple FIRs/Chargesheets, Joinder of Charges/Accused and Splitting of Trials
Who really is a “police officer?”. A quick case comment on the Supreme Court decision in Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu (2020 SCC OnLine SC 882)
Sample/Draft S.340 CrPC Application for perjury
All you need to know about the Law relating to Money-Laundering in India
Judgments without Tears | Part 1 | 'Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma' | Supreme Court on Daughter's Coparcenary Rights.
Rights of person receiving property under unregistered Sale Deed
Limitation period for breach of contract.

Blog Stats

991,208 Hits

Disclaimer

The views & opinions expressed here are solely with the view to make law more understandable to young law students, judiciary aspirants & the members of the Bar. I am extremely passionate about helping more and more bright young law students/lawyers take up judgeship; judges with the right values, skill-sets and a heart in the right place. That’s how I pay my dues. Also, I desire to create a platform for young lawyers to get the right mentorship (something I personally missed out on – in the first couple years)

Please do not contact for individual cases. This is not the purpose of this blog. Consult a local lawyer in a court near you.

By way of abundant caution, let me also make it clear:

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, we are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. The User acknowledges the following:

* there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website; the user wishes to gain more information about us for his/her own information and use;

* the information about us is provided to the user only on his/her specific request and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s volition and any transmission, receipt or use of this site would not create any lawyer-client relationship.

* The information provided under this website is solely available at your request for informational purposes only, should not be interpreted as soliciting or advisement.

We are not liable for any consequence of any action taken by the user relying on material/information provided under this website. In cases where the user has any legal issues, he/she in all cases must seek independent legal advice.

Nothing said here should be construed as legal advice or opinion.

Follow Blog via Email

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 9,363 other followers

Email Address:

Archives

Archives

Recent comments

	Gaurav Mehta on Who really is a “police office…
	Bharat Chugh on Who really is a “police office…
	Gaurav Mehta on Who really is a “police office…
	bhavuk sahni on Who really is a “police office…
	SR Agarwal on Who really is a “police office…

Recent posts

Arbitrary Execution of Foreign Letters of Request under the PMLA.
Who really is a “police officer?”. A quick case comment on the Supreme Court decision in Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu (2020 SCC OnLine SC 882)
“Snuggling to Survive”. A review of ‘Humankind : A Hopeful History’ by Rutger Bregman.
Law books for those in need
COVID and White Collar Crime

Twitter

Powered by WordPress.com.

Scroll Up