Law in 100 Words | Part 1 | Confronting a witness with documents during cross-examination

Law in 100 Words | Part 1 | Confronting a witness with documents during cross-examination

*Law in 100 Words – important legal/litigation concepts/procedures/practices explained simply and in less than 100 words. 

We kick-off this column with a very important subject : Confronting a witness with documents during cross-examination

Here goes:

An element of ‘surprise’ is essential to a successful cross examination. To impeach the credibility of a witness or to expose inconsistencies/falsehood, a witness, during cross examination, can be confronted with a document. Such documents are not required to be filed with the plaint or the written statement and can be shown to the witness for the first time during cross examination. Contrary to popular misconception, such confrontation material is not limited to a witness’ previous statements but can include other material also; material which the witness is expected to know/be able to explain/comment on. 

From the desk of Bharat Chugh

Further readings/Sources:

  1. Surinder Kumar Bajaj vs Sheela Rani Pasricha, 2009 SCC Online Del 3855
  2. Subash Chander v. Bhagwan Yadav, 2010 (114) DRJ 306
  3. Section 160-162 of CrPC.
  4. Section 145 of IEA.

9 responses to “Law in 100 Words | Part 1 | Confronting a witness with documents during cross-examination”

  1. Respected Sir,I admire yr 💯 words law Explainer series,which is very Helpful for layman like me.I easily understood the instant witness cross-examination. *”Aude aliquid dignum” (16th century Latin: “Dare something worthy”).SIR,you always Dare Sometime Worthy ! Sir,Keep making waves !Kind Regards/ SR

    Like

  2. Good fine tuning of cross examination.
    Would you please enlighten me on the following:

    Being in government service, one need to join certain joint inspection proceedings which is conducted by several officers from various streams – technical and non technical and every one signs the joint report. Whether, during trial, a non technical prosecution witness can be asked high tech questions pertaining to the case only because he is signatory to the joint report? If so, what should be his reply?

    Like

  3. Respected sir, It is really a very helpful initiative for the lawyers who have just started their career, i admire your way of teaching the students like us who are not even in touch with you or the young lawyers who are unable to have a direct communication with you,much appreciated. Thanks

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: